Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Mar 07 2003
• [Asrg] DCC and IP addresses, David F. Skoll
• Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Jed Margolin
• Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Nate W
• Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Troy Rollo
• Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
• [Asrg] Re: evaluating proposals against requirements, Nate W
• Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
• RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [Asrg] Collecting statistics, Vernon Schryver
• Re: [Asrg] RE: claims about law, Troy Rollo
• [Asrg] Peer to Peer MTA network, Claus Färber
• Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
• Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent, Troy Rollo
• Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
• Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
• RE: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), Sauer, Damon
• [Asrg] Collecting statistics, David F. Skoll
• Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Fedde
• Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
• Re: [Asrg] [OT] Sender verification, Kee Hinckley
• Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Vernon Schryver
• Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
• [Asrg] Race conditions at end of DATA, David F. Skoll
• RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), Vernon Schryver