[dhcwg] DNAv4 issue 8: Definition of "most likely" point of attachment
Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Thu, 16 October 2003 16:30 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA09783; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:30:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AAB0l-0003tP-5U; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:30:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AAB09-0003sa-Gh for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:29:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA09666 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:29:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AAB08-0006eu-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:29:24 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AAB07-0006e2-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:29:23 -0400
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h9GGSp1b016651 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rdroms-w2k01.cisco.com ([161.44.65.208]) by flask.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id ADE74362; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20031016121859.04808c58@flask.cisco.com>
X-Sender: rdroms@flask.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:28:48 -0400
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [dhcwg] DNAv4 issue 8: Definition of "most likely" point of attachment
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Description of issue Submitter name: Ralph Droms Submitter email address: rdroms@cisco.com Date first submitted: 10/16/2003 Reference: Document: DNA-03 Comment type: E Priority: 1 Section: 1.2 Terminology Rationale/Explanation of issue: The phrase '"most likely" point of attachment' is used throughout the document but is never defined. Other, similar phrases are occasionally used, such as '"most likely" network' in the fourth paragraph of section 2.3. Requested change: Add a definition for '"most likely" point of attachment' to the terminology section. Define an acronym MLPA for the phrase. Use the acronym throughout the document. Note that, as much as I dislike the proliferation of acronyms in IETF documents, in this case I think an acronym, suitably defined in the Terminology section, would add clarity. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg