IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsop] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-02.txt

Peter Koch <pk@denic.de> Thu, 26 October 2006 18:20 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd9qX-0008CM-2q for dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:20:53 -0400
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu ([128.223.142.45]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd9qV-0004M9-Nn for dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:20:53 -0400
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k9QHYIrI029623; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:34:18 -0700
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k9QHYI1W029621; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:34:18 -0700
Received: from denic.de (fw-d-whp.denic.de [81.91.160.27]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k9QHYHvb029604 for <dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu>; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:34:18 -0700
Received: by unknown.office.denic.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id D2BF53B9082; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:34:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:34:11 +0200
From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu>
Subject: [dnsop] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-02.txt
Message-ID: <20061026173411.GE3271@unknown.office.denic.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.5/2107/Thu Oct 26 07:33:29 2006 on mailapps
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Sender: owner-dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22

Dear WG,

this message initiates a working group last call for

	"Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks"
		draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-02.txt

to be published as a BCP. The WGLC will end Sat, 2006-11-11 23:59 UTC.

Please review and comment on this draft on this mailing list. The chairs
will not forward the document to the AD unless at least five reviewers
have indicated their support (for both the draft and the intended status).
Vendors' indication to follow (or not) the recommendation would be appreciated.

Please also include editorial comments; there will be a -03 anyway since
the current draft does not yet have an IANA considerations section.

Given the title, the history and the purpose of this draft (remember the
attacks launched at the beginning of this year?), vulnerability of other
systems or server types to (becoming an accomplice in) reflection or
amplification attacks and their specific counter measures is out of scope
for this particular document.

-Peter
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email