Re: [Ecrit] Let's make some decisions regardingdraft-rosen-ecrit-premature-disconnect-rqmts-00

["DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage at alcatel-lucent.com>]

There were a number of comments made in the meeting which I understood
would result in an update.

Is that available?

For example, I cannot judge the applicability of some of the
requirements without knowing whether "caller" refers to the caller as in
the human user or in the device belonging to that user.

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:29 PM
> To: 'ECRIT'
> Subject: [Ecrit] Let's make some decisions 
> regardingdraft-rosen-ecrit-premature-disconnect-rqmts-00
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Brian has kindly captured requirements about handling 
> abandoned calls and premature disconnects in emergency calls 
> in the following document:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-premature-disconnec
> t-rqmts-00.txt
> The document essentially summarizes discussions that took 
> place in the NENA i2.5 group. Thanks for the participants of 
> that group for their input.
> 
> We had a fairly heated discussion at the IETF#72 ECRIT meeting. 
> Unfortunately, we were not able to come to a conclusion 
> during the meeting. Marc and I had to postpone the discussion 
> to the list and here we are.
> 
> It would be good to hear your opinion about this issue so 
> that WE CAN FINALLY FINISH the phone BCP & the framework drafts.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> 
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit