[Enum] [voipeer] Revised VOIPEER Charter (note name change...)
David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net> Tue, 06 December 2005 16:07 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjfM0-0001fO-Ry; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:07:44 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjfM0-0001fE-9L for enum@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:07:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA17277 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:06:53 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: dmm@1-4-5.net
Received: from m106.maoz.com ([205.167.76.9]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjfhW-0007PE-G6 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:29:59 -0500
Received: from m106.maoz.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by m106.maoz.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jB6G7Yth017164 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:07:34 -0800
Received: (from dmm@localhost) by m106.maoz.com (8.13.4/8.12.11/Submit) id jB6G7YvD017163 for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:07:34 -0800
Resent-Message-Id: <200512061607.jB6G7YvD017163@m106.maoz.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: m106.maoz.com: dmm set sender to dmm@1-4-5.net using -f
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (mailapps.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.45]) by m106.maoz.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jB6Ft34A016635 for <dmm@1-4-5.net>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:55:03 -0800
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX1/JbmijLMaogcja+eUuvWBaMd0tVDtprS0@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jB6FsnNo021812; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:54:49 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jB6Fsn71021811; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:54:49 -0800
Received: from m106.maoz.com (m106.maoz.com [205.167.76.9]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jB6Fsigc021806 for <voipeer@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:54:44 -0800
Received: from m106.maoz.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by m106.maoz.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jB6Fsh9T016630; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:54:43 -0800
Received: (from dmm@localhost) by m106.maoz.com (8.13.4/8.12.11/Submit) id jB6FseMj016629; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:54:40 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: m106.maoz.com: dmm set sender to dmm@1-4-5.net using -f
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:54:40 -0800
From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
To: voipeer@lists.uoregon.edu
Message-ID: <20051206155440.GA16571@1-4-5.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-public-key: http://www.1-4-5.net/~dmm/public-key.asc
X-gpg-fingerprint: 2409 8B50 B389 A307 BA5C 2A16 3918 03D6 A099 D8A7
X-philosophy: "I find your lack of faith disturbing." -- Darth Vader, Star Wars Episode IV.
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1204/Mon Dec 5 02:09:54 2005 on mailapps
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on m106.maoz.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BIZ_TLD autolearn=no version=3.0.4
Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:07:34 -0800
Resent-To: enum@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a8041eca2a724d631b098c15e9048ce9
Cc: Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, mankin@psg.com
Subject: [Enum] [voipeer] Revised VOIPEER Charter (note name change...)
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1631917358=="
Sender: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Folks, Please find enclosed the most recent rev of the charter. Note also that the name has changed to speermint; there were various problems with the name SPEER (which came to light over various email discussions). Credit Jason with name speermint :-) Finally, we're working on getting speermint@lists.ietf.org going; I will let you know when that is complete. Dave --- Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect (speermint) Last Modified: 2005-12-06 Chair(s): Jason Livingood <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net> Transport Area Director(s): Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com> Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Transport Area Advisor: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com> Mailing Lists: General Discussion: speermint@ietf.org To Subscribe: speermint-request@ietf.org In Body: (un)subscribe Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/speermint/index.html Description of Working Group: The term "VoIP Peering" has historically been used to describe inter-provider network interconnect and the delivery of voice calls over interconnection points. While voice calls are the primary motivation for this today, other forms of real-time communications are and will continue to evolve as natural additions to such peering. Therefore, the focus of this working group is best generalized to describe calls as sessions, and to note that that such communications are inherently real-time in nature. SPEERMINT focuses architectures to identify, signal, and route delay-sensitive (real-time) communication sessions at the application level ("layer 5"). These sessions use the SIP signaling protocol to enable peering between two or more administrative domains over IP networks. Where these domains peer, or meet, the establishment of trust, security, and a resistance to abuse and attack are all important considerations. Note that the term "Layer 5 network" is used here to refer to the interconnection between application layer entities such as SIP servers, as opposed to interconnection at the IP network layer. However, in order to achieve real-time Session PEERing, both signaling and media flows must be taken into consideration. In addition, the working group recognizes that there will be use cases that require SPEERMINT to focus on the interaction between the application layer and lower network layers, or the dependence of specific application layer use cases on lower layers, so SPEERMINT will have to be prepared to solve these problems as they arise. More specifically, SPEERMINT focuses on real-time session routing architectures for layer 5 networks and their associated use cases. This includes the specification of the various types of application flows, such as signaling and media flows, in such networks, and includes both trunking and peer-to-peer flows. In addition, SPEERMINT considers requirements for the feedback of operational conditions (e.g., congestion control) that enables the application of dynamic policy and recognizes that various mechanisms for achieving this should be studied as a potential part of any architecture. SPEERMINT may also consider various mechanisms to support the application of Quality of Service (QoS) in some manner. In particular, SPEERMINT specifies mechanisms for layer 2 and/or layer 3 peering in support of real-time Session PEERing. It is important to note that these mechanisms may be developed in other working groups. In addition, SPEERMINT develops best current practices regarding exchange of real-time sessions among VoIP and other real-time application service providers and, in particular, how such calls are routed. SPEERMINT recognizes that some of these providers also control underlying access networks (facilities-based), while others do not (not facilities-based), and this fact may present various additional requirements or use cases for consideration, as well as guides SPEERMINT to maintain the greatest possible separation of the application layer from lower layers. The SPEERMINT work plan is also intimately related to the work plans being pursued by the ENUM and SIPPING working groups. In particular, while the ENUM Working Group is primarily concerned with the structure and lookup of data for the translation of E.164 numbers into URIs (RFC3761), SPEERMINT is concerned with the use of the resulting URI data, as well as non-ENUM-derived URI data, for use in signaling and routing of real-time sessions. Further issues that are out of scope for SPEERMINT include: o Interoperability, and NITS/profiling of existing protocols such as SIP, RTP, and SRTP, o SPIT prevention. Note, however, that other working groups may release relevant specifications that become required or are referenced by various SPEERMINT uses cases and BCPs, o Routing of sessions which are not signaled using SIP. In particular, SPEERMINT is constrained to consider only those scenarios in which call routing is signaled using the SIP protocol and addressed by SIP or SIPS URIs. E.164 numbers and other national or private formats may only be used as defined within the SIP protocols, and o H.323 --- Goals and Milestones: Mar 2006 Submit SPEERMINT terminology I-D. Mar 2006 Submit I-D defining the SPEERMINT routing architecture (Informational). Dec 2006 Submit I-D defining the message flows associated with the SPEERMINT routing architecture (Informational). Jan 2007 Submit I-D on the use of DNS SRV and NAPTR records as specified by RFC 3263 (BCP). Jan 2007 Submit I-D on the minimum set of requirements for SIP-based VoIP interconnection (BCP). Mar 2007 Submit I-D specifying the use of addressing forms and provides strong identities (BCP). Jun 2007 Submit I-D(s) on use cases (BCP). Jun 2006 Submit SPEERMINT terminology document to IESG (Informational). Mar 2007 Submit document to the IESG on the minimum set of requirements for SIP-based VoIP interconnection. Mar 2007 Submit document defining the call flows associated with the SPEERMINT routing architecture to the IESG (Proposed Standard). Jul 2006 Submit document defining the SPEERMINT routing architecture to the IESG (Informational). Mar 2007 Submit document to IESG specifying the use of addressing forms and provides strong identities (BCP). Jun 2007 Submit document to IESG on the use of DNS SRV and NAPTR records as specified by RFC 3263 (BCP). Jun 2007 Submit document(s) to IESG on use cases (BCP) (ongoing). Internet-Drafts: draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-01.txt Request For Comments: None
_______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum