Re: [HOKEY] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-05.txt

["Glen Zorn" <gzorn at arubanetworks.com>]

Dan Harkins <> scribbled on :

>  Hi,
> 
>  There's no "changes from -04" section of the -05 draft so
> what changed? And why? Is this in response to some comments in IETF
> LC? If so, which ones? And what about the other comments in IETF
> LC received on -04 that were not addressed in -05? What's the
> procedure on addressing them? Is there going to be an -06?

Since the state of the document is "Waiting for AD Go-Ahead", hopefully
not.

> 
>  A note to the chairmen: what happens to comments on -04 that
> weren't addressed in -05? Should they be made _again_ (and
> again and again) on on -05 or do they "carry over"?

There are a couple of ways that comments can be addressed: 

1) the document may be changed in response to the comment(s)
2) the comment(s) may be temporarily set aside pending further
discussion on the list
3) the comment(s) may be rejected

In the case of #2 the comments will eventually be considered & end up in
either bin #1 or bin # 2.  Comments may be rejected for several reasons
including (but not limited to) irrelevance and contradiction of WG
consensus; just because a given comment didn't result in the document in
question being changed doesn't mean that it wasn't addressed.  At this
point in the lifecycle of a draft, the "AD is responsible for verifying
that all Last Call comments have been adequately addressed" (see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/help/state/19/).  In this case
the AD referenced would be Tim Polk (copied).  

> 
>  Inquiring minds want to know....

Are there some particular comments you have in mind or is it just a
matter of curiosity about procedures?  If the former, please discuss the
matter w/Tim (copying, if you don't mind,
mailto:hokey-chairs at tools.ietf.org or the WG). 

> 
>  Dan.
> 

...
_______________________________________________
HOKEY mailing list
HOKEY at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey