Re: [HOKEY] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-05.txt

["Glen Zorn" <gzorn at arubanetworks.com>]

Dan Harkins <mailto:dharkins at lounge.org> scribbled on Thursday, April
24, 2008 11:07 PM:

...

>  Where is the issue list anyway? One would naively assume
> that it would be the "issues" link off
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/hokey/ but there is nothing there.

A while back ietf.org's list of working group charter pages got messed
up & we lost the link from the site.  It's at
http://www.ltsnet.net:8080/hokey/

> 
>  I understand comments can be rejected. Does one just infers
> that a comment has been rejected because all of a sudden the
> draft's status changes? Not knowing where the issue list
> resides one could also infer that an issue was "lost". I
> raised an issue in WGLC and heard nothing about resolution of
> it and then all of a sudden I notice the draft is in IETF LC.

I could have sworn that Charles had told you that there was, in his
opinion (which I share, BTW), long-standing WG consensus on the
structure of the key hierarchy.  Am I mistaken?

> Was the issue rejected? Was it lost? Dunno. Am I supposed to
> just wait for an announcement of publication from the RFC
> editor to find out about #45? That doesn't sound right.

As I mentioned in my last message, the person to talk to about this is
the AD.

> 
>  If the process is intentionally opaque then that would be
> nice to know. Just tell me and I'll just go away and grumble to
> myself. 

What would you consider to be a transparent outcome?

...
_______________________________________________
HOKEY mailing list
HOKEY at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey