[Hubmib] Re: WGLC - draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-01.txt
"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Sun, 24 April 2005 04:29 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DPYkb-00080H-9g; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:29:45 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DPYkY-00080C-B7 for hubmib@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:29:42 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA21965 for <hubmib@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpout1.bayarea.net ([209.128.95.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DPYwU-000791-S0 for hubmib@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:42:04 -0400
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (shell4.bayarea.net [209.128.82.1]) by smtpout1.bayarea.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3O4TToF005507 for <hubmib@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:29:30 -0700
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3O4TSjX029251; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:29:28 -0700
Received: from localhost (heard@localhost) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id j3O4TRg3029248; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:29:28 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: shell4.bayarea.net: heard owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:29:27 -0700
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Sender: heard@shell4.bayarea.net
To: Hub Mib <hubmib@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F083343A1@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10504171936420.10772-130000@shell4.bayarea.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-2133786286-899614893-1114316686=:28275"
Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10504232129150.28275@shell4.bayarea.net>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79668c4a0135b05f663aafe71bc273fd
Subject: [Hubmib] Re: WGLC - draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: hubmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ethernet Interfaces an Hub MIB WG <hubmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:hubmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: hubmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: hubmib-bounces@ietf.org
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:09:44 +0300, "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" wrote: > This is a Working Group Last Call announcement for the following > Internet-Draft: > > Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment > Units (MAUs) - http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/internet-drafts/ > draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-01.txt > > The Working Group intents to submit these documents to the IESG for > consideration as Proposed Standards. Please send your comments to > the WG mail list until May 2nd, 2005. > > This WGLC overwrites the previous WGLC for > draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-00.txt. Greetings, As is my custom, I will use the checklist from Appendix A of the MIB review guidelines to organize my comments. 1.) I-D Boilerplate -- if the draft is respun for any reason I think you will want to use the updated I-D boilerplate that refers to RFCs 3978 and 3979 which replace RFCs 3667 and 3668 respectively. 2.) Abstract -- the last sentence is not needed and would customarily be omitted, since this memo obsoletes RFC 3636 and RFC 3636 has already obsoleted RFCs 2668 and 1515. Also, it is rather long. I would suggest rewording along the following lines: OLD: This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it defines objects for managing IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs). This memo obsoletes RFC 3636. This memo extends that specification by moving MAU type object identities and some other relevant textual conventions into a separate Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) maintained MIB module, first version of which is defined in this document. Thus, when the new MAU types are defined by IEEE, only the IANA MIB module needs to be modified, leaving the MAU MIB module unchanged. In addition, management information is added for the management of Ethernet in the First Mile (EFM) and 10GBASE-CX4 MAUs. This memo also obsoletes RFC 2668 and RFC 1515. NEW: This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it defines objects for managing IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs). This memo obsoletes RFC 3636. It amends that specification by moving MAU type OBJECT-IDENTITY definitions and relevant textual conventions into a separate Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) maintained MIB module. In addition, management information is added to enable support for Ethernet in the First Mile (EFM) and 10GBASE-CX4 MAUs. 3.) MIB Boilerplate -- OK 4.) Security Considerations Section -- OK (unchanged from RFC 3636) 5.) IANA Considerations Section -- since the term Expert Review is used, there should be a reference to RFC 2434. Also, I don't think that the term "MAY be added" captures the intent of the WG; as I understood the discussion, the intent is that new MAU and/or Jack types defined by the IEEE 802.3 WG should be added to the IANA-MAU-MIB as soon as they are approved for publication by the IEEE, with the exception of things that aren't suitable for being managed by the MAU-MIB (e.g., things like the isoethernet MAU type known in clause 30 as "802.9a (99) Integrated Services MAU as defined in IEEE Std 802.9 ISLAN-16T", which was omitted from earlier revisions of the MAU-MIB). OLD: This document defines first version of the IANA maintaned MIB module. When a new MAU type and/or Jack type is defined by the IEEE 802.3 working group, it MAY be added to the IANA maintaned module via an Expert Review. NEW: This document defines first version of the IANA-maintaned MIB module IANA-MAU-MIB. It is intended that each new MAU type and/or Jack type defined by the IEEE 802.3 working group and approved for publication in a revision of IEEE Std 802.3 will be added to the IANA-maintaned module, provided that it is suitable for being managed by the base objects in the MAU-MIB. An Expert Review, as defined in RFC 2434 [RFC2434], is REQUIRED. Similar revisions to the maintenance instructions in the DESCRIPTION clause of the IANA-maintained MIB module are also needed. There is a non-self-contained reference [IEEE 802.3 Std] in that module which needs to be defined there, and since it also need to be updated when additions are made, it too is covered in the following proposed text: OLD: An Expert Review is REQUIRED for the addition of the new MAU types, when they are defined in the [IEEE 802.3 Std.]. Any document that proposes such an addition is REQUIRED to note any special properties of the MAU types that it defines - for example, side effects on the ifStackTable such as those noted in RFC 3636 Section 3.4.1 for 10GBASE-W MAUs. NEW: It is intended that each new MAU type and/or Jack type defined by the IEEE 802.3 working group and approved for publication in a revision of IEEE Std 802.3 will be added to this MIB module, provided that it is suitable for being managed by the base objects in the MAU-MIB. An Expert Review, as defined in RFC 2434 [RFC2434], is REQUIRED for such additions. The following reference is used throughout this MIB module: [IEEE 802.3 Std] refers to: IEEE Std 802.3, 2002 Edition: 'IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements - Part 3: Carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer specifications', as amended by IEEE Std 802.3ae-2002: 'Amendment: Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layer, and Management Parameters for 10 Gb/s Operation', August, 2002. This reference should be updated as appropriate when new MAU types and/or Jack types are added to this MIB module. NOTE: I am not 100% convinced that the awkward phrase "provided that it is suitable for being managed by the base objects in the MAU-MIB" really needs to be in the above, and I would shed no tears if it were cut out. 6.) References -- [RFC2434] should be a normative reference, since the term "Expert Review" that is defined in nthat document needs to be understood in order to implement the instructions in the IANA Considerations section. In the current text this reference is uncited; that, however, would be fixed by the proposed text in checklist items #5 and #10. 7.) Copyright Notices -- the copyright notices in the MIB modules need to have the year updated to 2005. 8.) IPR Notice -- OK 9.) Other issues -- not reviewed. Since the document has been prepared with xml2rfc, I have assumed that the "not covered elsewhere" issues mentioned in http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html are taken care of. 10.) Technical content -- in this part I cover significant editorial issues in the text, as well as the content of the MIB modules. (a) Editorial: the second and third paragraphs of Section 3.1 could used some wordsmithing. Proposed text: OLD: In order to decrease re-issues of this document due to the new MAU type introduction, all relevant object identities and textual conventions have been moved to a separate, IANA maintained MIB module, first version of which is defined in this memo. Thus when a new MAU type is defined by the IEEE 802.3 working group, only the IANA maintaned module would be re-issued by IANA, leaving the basic MIB module defined in this memo unchanged. In addition, the new definitions are added to the IANA maintaned MIB module, to support Ethernet in the First Mile (EFM) and 10GBASE-CX4 interfaces defined in IEEE Std 802.3ah-2004 and IEEE Std 802.3ak-2004 respectively. NEW: In order to decrease re-issues of this document due to the new MAU type and/or Jack type introduction, all relevant object identities and textual conventions have been moved to a separate IANA-maintained MIB module IANA-MAU-MIB, the first version of which is defined in this memo. Thus when a new MAU type and/or Jack type is defined by the IEEE 802.3 working group, only the IANA-maintaned module needs to be revised, leaving the basic MAU-MIB module defined in this memo unchanged. In addition, new definitions are added to the IANA-maintaned MIB module to support Ethernet in the First Mile (EFM) and 10GBASE-CX4 interfaces defined in IEEE Std 802.3ah-2004 [IEEE802.3ah] and IEEE Std 802.3ak-2004 [IEEE802.3ak] respectively. (b) As discussed on the mailing list, the changes made since RFC 3636 do not strictly follow the restrictions on MIB module revisions specified in RFC 2578 Section 10 and are not guaranteed to be 100% backward compatible. In particular, any MIB modules that import the MAU type OBJECT-IDENTITY descriptors from the MAU-MIB and any management tools that process those OBJECT-IDENTITY values (e.g., to present the DESCRIPTION text to a user) will need to be modified to import those definitions from the IANA-MAU-MIB instead. Because there is a good reason for making these changes, the rules can be waived; however, the MIB review guidelines do require that both the change and the justification be properly documented (cf. next-to-last paragraph of Section 4.9 of <draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-04.txt>). So I would like to recommend that the following text be added at the end of Section 3.1, "Relationship to RFC 3636": NEW: It should be noted that the changes made in this revision will not be entirely backward-compatible with MIB modules that currently import MAU type object identity descriptors from the MAU-MIB; such modules will need to be revised to import those DESCRIPTORS from the IANA-MAU-MIB. Similarly, any management applications that process the object identity definitions (e.g., to present the DESCRIPTION text to a user) will need to be get those definitions from the IANA-MAU-MIB instead of the MAU-MIB. While it is true that changes that require such adjustments are not strictly compliant with the SMIv2 rules governing MIB module revisions (see [RFC2578] Section 10), in this case continued high maintenance costs that would result from not making these changes maked the deviation from the rules justified. It should be noted that the working group was not able to find any examples of MIB modules or management applications that would actually be negatively affected by the changes. (c) Section 3.2, "Relationship to RFC 2668", needs to have its text brought up-to-date (it looks like it was copied without change from RFC 3636). Proposed changes: OLD: This MIB is intended to be a superset of that defined by RFC 2668 [RFC2668]. This MIB includes all of the objects contained in that MIB, with new and updated definitions which provide support for additional capabilities. Implementors are encouraged to support all applicable conformance groups in order to make the best use of the new functionality provided by this MIB. The new and updated definitions provide management support for 10 Gb/s devices. NEW: RFC 3636 was a replacement for RFC 2668 [RFC2668]. RFC 3636 included all of the objects contained in RFC 2668, but it also included new and updated definitions to provide management support for 10 Gb/s devices. (d) Section 3.8.1 could benefit from some wordsmithing. The next-to-last paragraph needs a reference to RFC 2434, and the last paragraph seems to be left over from an earlier proposal to require a Standards Action to add new MAU/Jack types. Proposed changes: OLD: An Expert Review is REQUIRED for the addition of the new MAU and Jack types. Any document that proposes such an addition is REQUIRED to note any special properties of the MAU types that it defines - for example, side effects on the ifStackTable as noted for 10GBASE-W MAUs. NEW: An Expert Review, as defined in RFC 2434 [RFC2434], is REQUIRED for the addition of the new MAU and/or Jack types. In some cases new MAU types may require additional managed objects or may have side effects on the behavior of existing managed objects. In such cases a standards-track specification (which may be a new document or a revision of this document) is also REQUIRED. Any such document is REQUIRED to note any special properties of the MAU types that it defines - for example, side effects on the ifStackTable as noted in this document for 10GBASE-W MAUs. (e) The IANA-MAU-MIB uses two branches of the OID subtree assigned to the MAU-MIB. It is essential that future maintenance activities to the MAU-MIB not assign any OIDs from these branches. In order to help prevent that error, I strongly recommend that there be some ASN.1 comments in the MAU-MIB to alert maintainers. Here are the suggested revisions: OLD: dot3RpMauBasicGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 1 } dot3IfMauBasicGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 2 } dot3BroadMauBasicGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 3 } dot3IfMauAutoNegGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 5 } NEW: dot3RpMauBasicGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 1 } dot3IfMauBasicGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 2 } dot3BroadMauBasicGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 3 } -- OIDs under the following -- branch are reserved for -- the IANA-MAU-MIB to assign -- as MAU type values: { snmpDot3MauMgt 4 } dot3IfMauAutoNegGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpDot3MauMgt 5 } -- the following OID is the -- MODULE-IDENTITY value -- for this MIB module: { snmpDot3MauMgt 6 } -- the following OID is the -- MODULE-IDENTITY value -- for the IANA-MAU-MIB: { snmpDot3MauMgt 7 } (f) smidiff tells me that the following DEFVAL clause has been added to both rpMauType and ifMauType: DEFVAL { zeroDotZero } This clause implies that zeroDotZero is an acceptable default value to populate into these objects when the agent creates them. But that is not so. The DESCRIPTION clause states that the values of these objects must be equal to the actual MAU type, unless that is unknown to the agent; then, and only then, should it use zeroDotZero. I respectfully request that these DEFVAL clauses be removed. For discussion see RFC 2578 Section 7.9. (g) The DESCRIPTION clause of ifMauTypeListBits needs a small adjustment owing to the introduction of the IANAifMauTypeListBits TC: OLD: Note that this MAU may be capable of operating as a MAU type that is beyond the scope of this MIB. This is indicated by returning the bit value bOther in addition to any bit values for capabilities that are listed above." NEW: Note that this MAU may be capable of operating as a MAU type that is beyond the scope of this MIB. This is indicated by returning the bit value bOther in addition to any bit values for standard capabilities that are listed in the IANAifMauTypeListBits TC." (h) Moving on to the IANA-MAU-MIB, the following text appears in the DESCRIPTION clauses of both rpMauType and ifMauType : The definition of this textual convention with the addition of newly assigned values is published periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to Internet Network Management number assignments. (The latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the IANA.) This is not entirely appropriate since the Assigned Numbers RFC is no longer being published (and has not been for over a decade ... see RFC 3232). I propose the following replacement: The most recent version of this textual convention is available in the on-line version of this MIB module on the IANA web site. (i) The REFERENCE clauses for dot3MauType2BaseTL and dot3MauType10PassTS contain the citation [EFM-CU-MIB], which is not defined in the MIB module (or, for that matter, anywhere else in the document). Since we require that MIB modules be self-contained, this reference either needs to be defined or needs to be removed. I recommend the latter. Here is the recommended text: OLD: dot3MauType2BaseTL OBJECT-IDENTITY STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Voice grade UTP copper, up to 2700m " REFERENCE "[IEEE 802.3 Std.], Sections 61 and 63; [EFM-CU-MIB]" ::= { dot3MauType 42 } dot3MauType10PassTS OBJECT-IDENTITY STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Voice grade UTP copper, up to 750m" REFERENCE "[IEEE 802.3 Std.], Sections 61 and 62; [EFM-CU-MIB]" ::= { dot3MauType 43 } NEW: dot3MauType2BaseTL OBJECT-IDENTITY STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Voice grade UTP copper, up to 2700m " REFERENCE "[IEEE 802.3 Std.], Sections 61 and 63" ::= { dot3MauType 42 } dot3MauType10PassTS OBJECT-IDENTITY STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Voice grade UTP copper, up to 750m" REFERENCE "[IEEE 802.3 Std.], Sections 61 and 62" ::= { dot3MauType 43 } (j) For completeness, I have attached the smilint and smidiff reports for the IANA-MAU-MIB and MAU-MIB. I have reviewed them and believe that all issues are accounted for above, but I would urge WG members and the document editor to double check. NOTE: the complaints about not starting new BITS values on a byte boundary should be IGNORED, text in RFC 2578 to the contrary notwithstanding. It does not matter for this object, which is read-only and where the absence of a bit means the same thing as its having the value zero, namely, that the corresponding MAU type is not offered/supported. Thanks for your patience. Regards, Mike Heard
--- Begin Message ---This is an automatically generated mail message in response to a mail message you (or someone else who used your address) sent to <smilint@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. If you want to learn more about this mail service, send a mail message with the "Subject: help" to <smilint@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. The program smilint 0.4.3, as of Fri Apr 01 10:26:14 2005 has been used to process your request as follows: smilint -m -s -e -l 9 -i namelength-32 -i type-unref IANA-MAU-MIB IANA-MAU-MIB:10: [4] {module-identity-registration} warning: uncontrolled MODULE-IDENTITY registration Additional descriptions of some error/warning messages: Warning: module-identity-registration (level 4) Message: uncontrolled MODULE-IDENTITY registration Description: The identities of IETF MIB modules should be registered below mib-2, transmission, or snmpModules so that the registration space can be controlled by IANA.--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---This is an automatically generated mail message in response to a mail message you (or someone else who used your address) sent to <smilint@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. If you want to learn more about this mail service, send a mail message with the "Subject: help" to <smilint@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. The program smilint 0.4.3, as of Fri Apr 01 10:26:14 2005 has been used to process your request as follows: smilint -m -s -e -l 9 -i namelength-32 rfc3636bis.mib rfc3636bis.mib:116: [5] {identifier-external-redifined} warning: redefinition of identifier `IANA-MAU-MIB::snmpDot3MauMgt' IANA-MAU-MIB:45: [6] {previous-definition} info: previous definition of `snmpDot3MauMgt' rfc3636bis.mib:116: [5] {identifier-external-redifined} warning: redefinition of identifier `IANA-MAU-MIB::snmpDot3MauMgt' IANA-MAU-MIB:170: [6] {previous-definition} info: previous definition of `snmpDot3MauMgt' rfc3636bis.mib:19: [4] {module-identity-registration} warning: uncontrolled MODULE-IDENTITY registration rfc3636bis.mib:169: [5] {index-element-accessible} warning: index element `rpMauGroupIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:169: [5] {index-element-accessible} warning: index element `rpMauPortIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:169: [5] {index-element-accessible} warning: index element `rpMauIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:556: [5] {index-element-accessible} warning: index element `ifMauIfIndex' of row `ifMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:556: [5] {index-element-accessible} warning: index element `ifMauIndex' of row `ifMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:1501: [5] {index-element-accessible} warning: index element `broadMauIfIndex' of row `broadMauBasicEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:1501: [5] {index-element-accessible} warning: index element `broadMauIndex' of row `broadMauBasicEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB Additional descriptions of some error/warning messages: Warning: module-identity-registration (level 4) Message: uncontrolled MODULE-IDENTITY registration Description: The identities of IETF MIB modules should be registered below mib-2, transmission, or snmpModules so that the registration space can be controlled by IANA.--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---This is an automatically generated mail message in response to a mail message you (or someone else who used your address) sent to <smilint@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. If you want to learn more about this mail service, send a mail message with the "Subject: help" to <smilint@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. The program smidiff 0.4.3, as of Fri Apr 01 10:26:14 2005 has been used to process your request as follows: smidiff -m -s -l 9 -i namelength-32 MAU-MIB rfc3636bis.mib /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:15: warning: uncontrolled MODULE-IDENTITY registration /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:440: warning: index element `rpMauGroupIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:440: warning: index element `rpMauPortIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:440: warning: index element `rpMauIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:854: warning: index element `ifMauIfIndex' of row `ifMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:854: warning: index element `ifMauIndex' of row `ifMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:1909: warning: index element `broadMauIfIndex' of row `broadMauBasicEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:1909: warning: index element `broadMauIndex' of row `broadMauBasicEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:116: warning: redefinition of identifier `IANA-MAU-MIB::snmpDot3MauMgt' IANA-MAU-MIB:45: info: previous definition of `snmpDot3MauMgt' rfc3636bis.mib:116: warning: redefinition of identifier `IANA-MAU-MIB::snmpDot3MauMgt' IANA-MAU-MIB:170: info: previous definition of `snmpDot3MauMgt' rfc3636bis.mib:19: warning: uncontrolled MODULE-IDENTITY registration rfc3636bis.mib:169: warning: index element `rpMauGroupIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:169: warning: index element `rpMauPortIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:169: warning: index element `rpMauIndex' of row `rpMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:556: warning: index element `ifMauIfIndex' of row `ifMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:556: warning: index element `ifMauIndex' of row `ifMauEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:1501: warning: index element `broadMauIfIndex' of row `broadMauBasicEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:1501: warning: index element `broadMauIndex' of row `broadMauBasicEntry' should be not-accessible in SMIv2 MIB rfc3636bis.mib:19 [5] {contact-changed} warning: contact of `MAU-MIB' changed rfc3636bis.mib:19 [5] {description-changed} warning: description of module identity definition `MAU-MIB' changed rfc3636bis.mib:74 [5] {revision-added} warning: revision `2005-04-15 00:00' added /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:15 [6] {previous-definition} info: previous definition of `MAU-MIB' rfc3636bis.mib:120 [5] {status-change} warning: legal status change from `current' to `deprecated' for `JackType' rfc3636bis.mib:120 [5] {description-changed} warning: description of textual convention definition `JackType' changed /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:107 [6] {previous-definition} info: previous definition of `JackType' rfc3636bis.mib:239 [3] {defval-added} default value added to `rpMauType' rfc3636bis.mib:239 [5] {description-changed} warning: description of object definition `rpMauType' changed /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:513 [6] {previous-definition} info: previous definition of `rpMauType' rfc3636bis.mib:536 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `cx4' added to type used in `rpJackType' rfc3636bis.mib:607 [3] {defval-added} default value added to `ifMauType' rfc3636bis.mib:607 [5] {description-changed} warning: description of object definition `ifMauType' changed /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:908 [6] {previous-definition} info: previous definition of `ifMauType' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [5] {from-implicit} warning: type `IANAifMauTypeListBits' replaces implicit type for `ifMauTypeListBits' /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:1337 [6] {previous-definition} info: previous definition of `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [3] {named-bit-added-old-byte} named bit `b10GbaseCX4' added without starting in a new byte in type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [3] {named-bit-added-old-byte} named bit `b2BaseTL' added without starting in a new byte in type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [3] {named-bit-added-old-byte} named bit `b10PassTS' added without starting in a new byte in type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [3] {named-bit-added-old-byte} named bit `b100BaseBX10D' added without starting in a new byte in type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [3] {named-bit-added-old-byte} named bit `b100BaseBX10U' added without starting in a new byte in type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [3] {named-bit-added-old-byte} named bit `b100BaseLX10' added without starting in a new byte in type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [3] {named-bit-added-old-byte} named bit `b1000BaseBX10D' added without starting in a new byte in type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `b1000BaseBX10U' added to type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `b1000BaseLX10' added to type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `b1000BasePX10D' added to type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `b1000BasePX10U' added to type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `b1000BasePX20D' added to type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1008 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `b1000BasePX20U' added to type used in `ifMauTypeListBits' rfc3636bis.mib:1088 [5] {named-number-added} warning: named number `cx4' added to type used in `ifJackType' /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:145 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:147 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauTypeAUI' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:153 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10Base5' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:159 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauTypeFoirl' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:165 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10Base2' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:171 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseT' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:185 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseFP' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:191 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseFB' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:197 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseFL' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:209 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10Broad36' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:218 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseTHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:224 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseTFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:230 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseFLHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:239 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10BaseFLFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:245 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType100BaseT4' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:251 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType100BaseTXHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:257 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType100BaseTXFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:263 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType100BaseFXHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:269 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType100BaseFXFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:275 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType100BaseT2HD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:281 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType100BaseT2FD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:292 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseXHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:298 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseXFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:304 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseLXHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:311 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseLXFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:318 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseSXHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:325 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseSXFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:332 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseCXHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:342 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseCXFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:349 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseTHD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:355 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType1000BaseTFD' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:363 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseX' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:369 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseLX4' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:375 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseR' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:381 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseER' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:389 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseLR' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:395 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseSR' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:401 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseW' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:407 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseEW' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:413 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseLW' has been deleted /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf/MAU-MIB:419 [1] {node-removed} node `dot3MauType10GigBaseSW' has been deleted--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Hubmib mailing list Hubmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
- [Hubmib] WGLC - draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-01.t… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [Hubmib] Re: WGLC - draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-… C. M. Heard