[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Protocol Action: 'RTP Payload Format for BroadVoice Speech Codecs' to Proposed Standard
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'RTP Payload Format for BroadVoice Speech Codecs '
<draft-ietf-avt-rtp-bv-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Audio/Video Transport Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Allison Mankin and Jon Peterson.
Technical Summary:
This specification describes an RTP payload format for the BroadVoice
(TM) speech codec. It is a very straight-forward payload format, with
one or more frames of coded speech data being placed into each RTP
packet with no additional framing. Definitions to allow the use of
this format with SDP and MIME are provided.
Working Group Summary:
The working group supported advancing this specification.
The IETF has received a request from Cablelabs to publish this
specification quickly.
Protocol Quality:
The BroadVoice(TM) codec is likely to see widespread use in certain
communities. The design of the codec is a very good fit with the RTP
framework, and hence this protocol is simple and of high quality.
MIME media types review received no comments.
Notes to the RFC Editor
Abstract
OLD:
This document describes the RTP payload format for the
BroadVoice(TM) narrowband and wideband speech codecs developed by
Broadcom Corporation.
NEW:
This document describes the RTP payload format for the
BroadVoice(TM) narrowband and wideband speech codecs.
The narrowband codec, called BroadVoice16, or BV16,
has been selected by CableLabs as a mandatory codec in
PacketCable 1.5 and has a CableLabs specification.
Section 2, first paragraph
OLD:
BroadVoice is a speech codec family developed by Broadcom for VoIP
(Voice over Internet Protocol) applications, including Voice over
Cable, Voice over DSL, and IP phone applications.
NEW:
BroadVoice is a speech codec family developed for VoIP
(Voice over Internet Protocol) applications, including Voice
over Cable, Voice over DSL, and IP phone applications.
Section 2, second paragraph:
OLD:
More specifically, the BV16 codec was selected as one of the
mandatory audio codecs in PacketCable (TM) 1.5 Audio/Video
Codecs Specification [4].
NEW:
More specifically, the BV16 codec was selected as one of the
mandatory audio codecs in PacketCable (TM) 1.5 Audio/Video
Codecs Specification [4] and has been implemented by multiple
vendors. The wideband version (BV32) has been developed by
Broadcom but has not yet appeared in
a public specification; since it is technically very similar
to BV16, its payload format is also defined in this document.
Section 3.1, Figure 1:
Please remove blank line under L0, L1 etc. row in the figure.
Section 5.1, "maxptime" bullet
OLD:
maxptime: See RFC 2327 [5] for its definition. The maxptime
SHOULD be a multiple of the duration of a single codec data
frame (5 ms).
NEW:
maxptime: See RFC 3267 [8] for its definition. The maxptime
SHOULD be a multiple of the duration of a single codec data
frame (5 ms).
Section 10.1:
One new normative reference:
NEW:
[8] Sjoberg, J., Westerlund, M., Lakaniemi, A., and Q. Xie,
"Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) Payload Format and File
Storage Format for the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) and Adaptive
Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) Audio Codecs", RFC 3267, June 2002.
Section 7: First paragraph
OLD:
RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
specification [1] and any appropriate profile (for example, [7]).
This implies that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved
by encryption. Because the data compression used with this payload
format is applied end-to-end, encryption may be performed after
compression so there is no conflict between the two operations.
NEW:
RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
specification [1] and any appropriate profile (for example, [7]).
This implies that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved
by encryption.
Removal of the last sentence!
Section: 9
OLD:
The authors would like to thank Magnus Westerlung, Colin Perkins,
Allison Mankin, and Jean-Francois Mule for their review of this
document.
NEW
The authors would like to thank Magnus Westerlund, Colin Perkins,
^
Allison Mankin, and Jean-Francois Mule for their review of this
document.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce