Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN
Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com> Thu, 28 August 2003 15:31 UTC
Received: from asgard.ietf.org (asgard.ietf.org [10.27.6.40]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA24208 for <ietf-web-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:31:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordomo by asgard.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.14) id 19sOYF-0004dP-SN for ietf-list@asgard.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:19:07 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([10.27.2.28]) by asgard.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19sOXN-0004b2-6f for ietf@asgard.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:18:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA23392 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:18:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sOXL-00019N-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:18:11 -0400
Received: from sa.vix.com ([204.152.187.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sOXL-000197-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:18:11 -0400
Received: from sa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14DB139C1; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:17:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vixie@sa.vix.com)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN
In-Reply-To: Message from Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com> of "Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:43:38 +0200." <20030828094338.GQ910@apb.cequrux.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4; nmh 1.0.4; GNU Emacs 21.3.1
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:17:36 +0000
Message-Id: <20030828151736.D14DB139C1@sa.vix.com>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
> > (3) publishes BIND 9, which uses NXDOMAIN in this situation, and > (3) is a bug in bind 9. which version/versions, specifically? see below. --- ;; ANSWER SECTION: version.bind. 0 CH TXT "9.3.0a0" --- ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;this.example.vix.com. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: example.vix.com. 3600 IN SOA example.vix.com. root.vix.com. 2003082602 1800 900 604800 86400 --- #fh:i386# grep this example.vix.com test.a.is.this A 127.0.0.5 --- i don't know why any of you is bothering to refute bernstein's assertions, or even respond to him, or even read his tripe. however, do consider the likelihood of him defending my prior comments had he DISAGREED with them, and also consider that whilest i did in fact misunderstand/misread RFC2308, several other members of what bernstein laughably calls "the bind company", notably the author of rfc2308 and a coauthor of the current wildcard draft, have views remarkably different than the one bernstein quotes me as having. can we have some serious discourse now?
- Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN D. J. Bernstein
- Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN Alan Barrett
- Re: wcard-clarify breaking RFC 2308 NXDOMAIN Paul Vixie