Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> Thu, 18 March 2004 22:28 UTC
Received: from asgard.ietf.org (asgard.ietf.org [10.27.6.40]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA12791 for <ietf-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:28:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by asgard.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.14) id 1B45vd-0000Oe-Ii for ietf-list@asgard.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:23:53 -0500
Received: from ietf.org ([10.27.2.28]) by asgard.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1B45uW-0000Df-KL for ietf@asgard.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:22:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA12626 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:22:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B45uV-0002Ss-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:22:43 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B45tW-0002QH-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:21:42 -0500
Received: from sa.vix.com ([204.152.187.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B45tF-0002O8-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:21:25 -0500
Received: by sa.vix.com (Postfix, from userid 716) id F180214C86; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:20:51 +0000 (GMT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
References: <405A182E.18803389@nma.com>
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:20:51 +0000
In-Reply-To: <405A182E.18803389@nma.com>
Message-ID: <g3wu5hhk58.fsf@sa.vix.com>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
egerck@nma.com (Ed Gerck) writes: > Dean, > > I'm not gonna feed the troll. ... NOW you're not gonna feed the troll? where's the "...any more!" ?? it does me no good to filter out postings from known whackjobs if you and others are just going to reply anyway, often including the very drivel that i'd avoided having to look at directly. please show some self-restraint. -- Paul Vixie
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Doug Royer
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Robert G. Brown
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- RE: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Christian Huitema
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Ed Gerck
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Paul Vixie
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson
- RE: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Fleischman, Eric
- Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement Dean Anderson