Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd)
Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> Mon, 21 June 2004 16:26 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA00211 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:26:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BcRcz-000702-Ck for ietf-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:26:37 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BcR4v-0000sH-00 for ietf-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:51:25 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BcQ2s-0000i0-02; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:45:14 -0400
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BcPmh-0004FV-KD; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:28:31 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BcPWk-0007Wk-JS; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:12:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BbWhi-0001AK-Ud for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:39:42 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA13314 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:39:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BbWhf-0002v2-W8 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:39:40 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BbWgi-0002Vp-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:38:41 -0400
Received: from sa.vix.com ([204.152.187.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BbWeS-0001VP-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:36:20 -0400
Received: by sa.vix.com (Postfix, from userid 716) id EDE8413DE5; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:35:49 +0000 (GMT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <043e01c455a5$0e0770f0$6401a8c0@stephen>
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:35:49 +0000
In-Reply-To: <043e01c455a5$0e0770f0$6401a8c0@stephen>
Message-ID: <g3oeng9q3u.fsf@sa.vix.com>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:08:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
stephen@sprunk.org ("Stephen Sprunk") writes: > ... > Dean's problem is that he sends mail from an open relay, which isc.org's > servers block completely ... actually i think the reason dv8's ip address listed on SORBS is due to reported irregularities in the trust deed for that address block, rather than due to reported open relay activities. maybe dv8 will eventually sue somebody, so that a court can sort it all out and all the facts can be objectively and publically known. a note for harald and the others-- i've been lawsuit-threated by experts, and i can tell you from that experience, dv8 appears to not be an expert. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Dean Anderson
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Mark Smith
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) David Kessens
- RE: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) bill
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Vernon Schryver
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Paul Vixie
- solution -- Re: Response to complaint from Dean A… Ed Gerck
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dave Crocker
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Gene Gaines
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Anthony DeRobertis
- RE: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) bill
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Fred Templin