Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd)

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 22 June 2004 18:07 UTC

Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:17:27 +0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <693894942.20040622171727@brandenburg.com>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <31098184049B948E29A29935@[192\.168\.1\.47]>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406161800430.6106-100000@cirrus.av8.net> <31098184049B948E29A29935@[192.168.1.47]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd)
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Harald,

HTA> we have been very patient with you, but you are misrepresenting the
HTA> situation.


Both parts of your statement are not only true, but have been true
quite a number of times in the past, with respect to this particular
"claimant".

We have policies for dealing with those who post to IETF mailing lists
contrary to the mailing lists policies.

I think it is time to invoke similar policies for those who abuse IETF
process.

The alternative is acceding to a deprivation of service attack.  IETF
resources are scarce and we need to start acting like we believe it.

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Dean Anderson
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Mark Smith
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson Nathaniel Borenstein
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Stephen Sprunk
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) David Kessens
RE: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) bill
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Stephen Sprunk
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Vernon Schryver
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Paul Vixie
solution -- Re: Response to complaint from Dean A… Ed Gerck
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dave Crocker
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Valdis.Kletnieks
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Dean Anderson
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Gene Gaines
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Anthony DeRobertis
RE: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) bill
Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd) Fred Templin