Re: Need for an Agenda Cutoff date?

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Mon, 07 March 2005 19:50 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA25951; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:50:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D8OH9-0004mP-Ml; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:52:24 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D8ODj-0006mv-V1; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:48:51 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D8ODh-0006mq-Vh for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:48:50 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA25869 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:48:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D8OFv-0004jV-UZ for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:51:09 -0500
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j27JmX0Q157214 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:48:33 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j27JmXQn185406 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:48:33 +0100
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j27JmX3n001681 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:48:33 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j27JmW3b001673; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:48:32 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-146-219-141.de.ibm.com [9.146.219.141]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA105750; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:48:31 +0100
Message-ID: <422CB00C.1070500@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:48:28 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
References: <422C7B44.2020709@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <422C7B44.2020709@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Need for an Agenda Cutoff date?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Joe,

There is an agenda cutoff that WG chairs are supposed
to respect. This time it was:

 > The agenda for the Working Group is due by Monday,
 > February 28 at 12:00 ET (17:00 GMT).

But there were many late agendas and there was a glitch
in the process of posting them.

For BOFs, the formal BOF proposal must include an agenda,
and that was due this time on February 21.

We need to try and follow our own rules next time.

    Brian

Joe Touch wrote:
> Hi, all,
> 
> With agendas appearing ever later - including last night, the issue of 
> cutoff dates should be revisited.
> 
> If reading the drafts to be discussed is NOT an issue, then the I-D 
> cutoff dates should be dropped.
> 
> If reading the drafts IS an issue, then, by correlary, there should be a 
> corresponding cutoff date for agendas - e.g., 1 week after the last 
> cutoff I-D date. Jjust as I-Ds that pass the cutoffs are not published 
> for this IETF, WGs that fail to meet that deadline should be CANCELLED.
> 
> Consider this a proposal, or at least a request.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf