Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 29 September 2005 21:33 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EL61z-0000CJ-Ix; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:33:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EL61y-0000CE-CD for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:33:30 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA14632 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:33:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EL69g-0000Pa-3t for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:41:30 -0400
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C954E2596CE; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:32:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23119-08; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:32:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.145] (163.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.163]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF642596CD; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:32:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:33:18 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>
Message-ID: <42CE32C65E14A25DDBE31533@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <0ECAC1DE-9D8B-425A-9F02-3B2154E4F9B5@MIT.EDU>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0509290832560.8165-100000@cirrus.av8.net> <0ECAC1DE-9D8B-425A-9F02-3B2154E4F9B5@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF General Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

--On torsdag, september 29, 2005 17:02:48 -0400 Ken Raeburn 
<raeburn@MIT.EDU> wrote:

> So, to summarize my look at a few of the messages: You both lose  points
> for some of your statements or how you tried to make your  arguments, and
> the accuracy of the summary page is questionable.   None of it, so far,
> really suggests any sort of professional  dishonesty on Ted's part to me.
> (If this were a research paper  instead of an email message, I'd probably
> want him to be much more  careful and even pedantic in his arguments, but
> that would be about  the quality of the work, not honesty.)

I think you illustrate quite well why I'm glad I don't have to talk to Dean 
Anderson any more.

Any conversation where I can't toss of a casual remark without getting 
virtually crucified for it is a conversation not worth having.





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf