Re: Comments on draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt

[Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>]

On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:

> I'd also like to note that our specifications are not atomic;  
> advancing from PS to DS means showing at least two interworking  
> implementations of every feature and option.

Yes. The questions, at least in my mind, are:

(1) what does it take to demonstrate DS qualifications, and
(2) what is the additional value of Full Standard?

I would like to believe that a well documented interoperability test  
constitutes DS qualification; the current DS qualification sets the  
bar somewhat higher than that, and I note that few documents actually  
achieve that, even though we can daily see implementations  
interoperating in the field at PS.

I'm not sure that Full Standard means a lot besides "obsolete".  
Personal opinion.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf