Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?



On 2008-08-16 10:48, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
> Reading through this, I see that the recommendation that
> an IPR discloser "withdraw a previous disclosure if a revised
> Contribution negates the previous IPR disclosure" made it into
> the BCP.  Someone else will have to decide if this is already
> consonant with Paul's suggestion, or whether it would have
> to be amended.

"Withdraw" does not imply "remove", of course. To me, it has
always meant "update the existing disclosure to state that
it does not apply to the later draft." It still applies to
the earlier draft, and that earlier draft is still an
IETF Contribution for all eternity.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.