Re: draft-ietf-ipr-trademarks-00.txt

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson <jas at extundo.com> writes:

    Simon> How much money would you estimate that the SECSH WG spent
    Simon> on evaluating the unclear trademark situation?  Is it
    Simon> higher than 5000/200=25 dollars?

    Simon> If Bill's understanding that "many [SECSH] WG participants
    Simon> [...]  personally investigated" the SECSH trademark
    Simon> validity is correct, then it appears to me that requiring a
    Simon> trademark IPR statement before adding trademark designators
    Simon> to documents would avoid, or at least simplify, similar
    Simon> problems in other WGs.

Except that I don't believe your proposed requirement would actually
avoid wasting this time.  I think it might make it even more likely.


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg