[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipr-trademarks-00.txt

On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 17:52, Simon Josefsson wrote:

> If I understood Bill correctly this time (feel free to correct me),
> the SECSH problem was that a contributor did not file a proper IPR
> statement, but still wanted the trademark to be identified or
> acknowledgment, because of some argument that trademark owners must
> always identify their own trademarks. 

No, this is not correct.  Please review the secsh archives for the complete story.

					- Bill




_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg