[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipr-trademarks-00.txt

In message <20050207014901.80977209BEB at newdev.harvard.edu>, Scott Bradner write
s:
>
>
>my ID was trying to deal with the case where someone *wanted* to
>note that a term or phrase was a trade or service mark - I expect
>the most likely case would be when the author (or the author's company)
>claimed the mark and wanted to be sure that people knew that
>

This is indeed the problem we need to solve.  3667 permits such 
acknowledgment; when the issue came up in the secsh WG, we found that 
the language wasn't clear enough.

		--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg