Re: Question about timeline

[Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org>]

Obviously.  My point is that -incoming shouldn't be approved until
there is a working process to give third parties rights according to
whatever is in -outgoing.  Publishing the documents at the same time
doesn't meet that objective -- rights are not granted to third parties
until the IASA reads -outgoing and writes legal text and publish it.

/Simon

"David B Harrington" <dbharrington at comcast.net> writes:

> If we currently do not get from authors all the rights we want to
> grant, then the outgoing rights cannot be granted until we have the
> right to grant those rights. 
>
> dbh
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Simon Josefsson [mailto:simon at josefsson.org] 
>> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:32 PM
>> To: ipr-wg at ietf.org
>> Subject: Question about timeline
>> 
>> Will the -incoming document be approved before the IASA have drafted
>> and approved the legal text that will be used for documents,
>> presumably based on the approved and published -outgoing document?
>> 
>> I believe approval of -incoming must wait until the outgoing rights
>> from the IETF Trust to third parties are in place and up and
> running.
>> Otherwise, as far as I can tell, third parties (including RFC
> mirrors)
>> will have no rights to even distribute unmodified copies of
> documents
>> published under the new rules in -incoming.
>> 
>> /Simon
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ipr-wg mailing list
>> Ipr-wg at ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
>> 

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg