Re: recourse if our rules are violated?

[Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

 [2026 4.2]
> A specification may have been superseded by a more recent
> Internet Standard, or have otherwise fallen into disuse or disfavor.
> ------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Disfavor" fits, thanks.

 [2026 6.1]
> A "standards action" -- entering a particular specification into,
> advancing it within, or removing it from, the standards track --
> must be approved by the IESG.

A few days ago I checked 6.1.1, that section starts with "enter or 
advance", and I wasn't looking for "remove".  In conjunction with
6.1 apparently anybody can try to initiate a "standards action" if
it's not about a document of an existing WG.

Good, that's a better knife than the "certified troll" BCP.

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg