RE: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI

[brown_David1 at emc.com]

How would an FCoE-based initiator communicate with iSCSI-based storage? 

In other words, can the same host adapter be used for FCoE connections
and iSCSI sessions, and if so, would the performance be similar?

thanks,
dj
________________________________

	From: John Hufferd [mailto:jhufferd at Brocade.COM] 
	Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:52 AM
	To: Sandars, Ken; Eddy Quicksall; Julian Satran
	Cc: ips at ietf.org
	Subject: RE: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI
	
	

	Ken,

	The term FCoE has as its primary component FC.  Consider the
possibility that the DCE Link from the Host connects to a switch/device
that is able to deal with the FC part of the FCoE.

	 

	.

	.

	.

	John L Hufferd

	Sr. Executive Director of Technology

	jhufferd at brocade.com <mailto:jhufferd at brocade.com> 

	Office Phone: (408) 333-5244; eFAX: (408) 904-4688

	Alt Office Phone: (408) 997-6136; Cell: (408) 627-9606

	

	________________________________

		From: Sandars, Ken [mailto:ken_sandars at adaptec.com] 
	Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 6:41 PM
	To: John Hufferd; Eddy Quicksall; Julian Satran
	Cc: ips at ietf.org
	Subject: RE: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI

	 

	Hey John,

	 

	[Hufferd] Many servers are asking for an evolutionary way to
combine their Networking connections from the Server.  The customers I
have dealt with do NOT want to rip out FC, they want to provide a single
Link for transport of all networking needs, including storage, exiting
their servers.

	
	I'm not sure what you are saying here. Are you saying servers
should have a single type of physical network connection, presumably
ethernet? How does that align with not wanting to rip out FC?

	 

	Thanks

	Ken



_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips