IPv6 WG Consensus call: draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 13 April 2005 18:25 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA20028 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:25:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DLmiV-00074j-T7 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:36:01 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DLmV7-00010j-RV; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:22:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DLmV5-0000xY-KP for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:22:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19825 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:21:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from piper.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.26.33] helo=jhuapl.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DLmem-0006z9-KC for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:32:09 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.124.185]) by piper.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id KP-BXZ33.10465299; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:21:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200504121420.j3CEKY1p017039@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <200504121420.j3CEKY1p017039@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Message-Id: <853acce3627cabf053004a5206ffd526@innovationslab.net>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:21:24 -0400
To: IPv6 WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-esp: ESP<41>=RBL:<0> RDNS:<0> SHA:<41> UHA:<0> SLS:<0> BAYES:<0> SPF:<0> HTML Dictionary (TRU6):<0> NigeriaScam Dictionary (TRU6):<0> URL Dictionary (TRU6):<0> Phishing:<0> Spam Dictionary (TRU6):<0> CAN-SPAM Compliance Dictionary (TRU6):<0> Obscenities Dictionary (TRU6):<0> Embed HTML Dictionary (TRU6):<0> Porn Dictionary (TRU6):<0>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0fa76816851382eb71b0a882ccdc29ac
Cc: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
Subject: IPv6 WG Consensus call: draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0467926299=="
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5011df3e2a27abcc044eaa15befcaa87

IPv6 WG,
      This is a status update on the centrally-allocated ULAs defined in
draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt.  At this time the chairs believe it
is prudent to gain operational experience with the locally-assigned
ULA specification (which is currently in the RFC Editor's Queue)
before continuing work on the centrally-allocated mechanism.

      The chairs would like to solicit input from WG members on this
approach.  Please state your support or disagreement with this
approach.  Those who disagree, please state rationale for wanting
to continue this work at this time.

Regards,
Brian & Bob
IPv6 WG co-chairs


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------