Re: Question for IPv6 w.g. on [Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues]

["Eric Klein" <ericlklein.ipv6 at gmail.com>]

 

On 5/1/07, Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> wrote:

Eric Klein wrote:
> I have just noticed that this topic seems to be going on simutaniously
> on both the IPv6 and v6OPS mailing lists.
>
> The two threads are not coordinated, but both seem very concerned with
> IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues.
[..]
> It concerns me that the two teams are working seperatly to solve the
> same issue.

You misunderstand. These are two separate groups, although some members
of them fall under both groups and participate in both. Which is a good
thing as without one the other doesn't exist and vice versa, thus feed
back from both into both is very important. Unfortunately not everybody
can participate in both as some people have networks to run etc ;)

 

 

Jeroen,

 

I am sorry if I was unclear. I am on both lists and understand their diffrences.
 

 

My concern is that both lists are reviewing this problem and looking for a solution independently of each other.

 

So I am wondering which group is more appropriate for a soltuion, thus the topic would fall under:

1. IPv6 WG

2. v6OPS WG

3. Some sort of joint discussions

4. Inter-Area WG

 

I do not see how the multiple lists will coordinate their solutions if there is confusion over the ownership of the issue.

 

Eric
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------