Routing Header Type 0 way forward

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 14 May 2007 20:27 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hnh8o-0000e1-2K; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:27:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hngu6-0003zA-LP for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:12:22 -0400
Received: from pilot.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200] helo=jhuapl.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hngu5-0003lb-FG for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:12:22 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.206.105]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 5502123.31570333; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:12:05 -0400
Message-ID: <4648C294.6090600@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:12:04 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <464883F7.4090906@innovationslab.net> <C0419CEF-7263-4CE0-838C-7C42423FD698@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0419CEF-7263-4CE0-838C-7C42423FD698@nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:27:31 -0400
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
Subject: Routing Header Type 0 way forward
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

IPv6 WG,
     The chairs have reviewed all the comments and feedback on the
Routing Header Type 0 vulnerability.  The consensus of the working group
is seen as:

     - Deprecate the Type 0 Routing Header
     - Provide guidance to operators to disable RH0 where possible

As a part of the deprecation, implementations should return an ICMP
parameter problem message to the packet source.

     The chairs request that the authors of the two two drafts currently
published discussing the RH0 issue (draft-jabley-ipv6-rh0-is-evil-00.txt
and draft-savola-ipv6-rtheader-00.txt) combine them and publish a single
draft as an IPv6 w.g. document.

     Please make any issues/problems you may have with this approach
known to either the mailing list or the chairs directly.

Regards,
Bob and Brian
IPv6 WG co-chairs



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------