Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Tue, 02 October 2007 07:11 UTC
Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Icbux-0002Xi-F2; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:11:43 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Icbuv-0002XF-I6 for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:11:41 -0400
Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Icbup-0007y8-6d for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:11:41 -0400
Received: from [163.117.139.34] ([163.117.139.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l92777Pc080709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
In-Reply-To: <47012FE3.7090503@ca.afilias.info>
References: <C322815E.3360%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com><71A493FD-D638-4301-BB7A-54429DE8812B@apple.com><319D54578EAC3147BA8CC78DAB5467A501399AFD@FRVELSMBS12.ad2.ad.alcatel.com><EBBF4EDD-46EC-4153-BD49-850121B58CD3@muada.com><47421CC1-E755-4A8B-A0E1-E047C9D609CB@cisco.com> <18176.59456.20712.791245@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDAD6@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <684CC96D-ACBB-421B-BE91-09A634F1C1A8@cisco.com> <47012FE3.7090503@ca.afilias.info>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <0895FF74-2540-46AF-9AF2-DFEDF637A92C@muada.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:26:22 +0200
To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=3.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on sequoia.muada.com
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Cc: IPV6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
On 1-okt-2007, at 19:35, Brian Dickson wrote: > I'm a bit confused by the above. It might be terminology, or your > use of it, but either way, it would be helpful to give some > examples of IOS server(s) and IOS client(s), doing DHCPv6 vanilla, > and DHCPv6 with PD. You mean something like this? ! interface Ethernet1 ipv6 address autoconfig ipv6 dhcp client pd dhcpv6prefix ! interface Ethernet2 ipv6 address dhcpv6prefix 0:0:0:A0::/64 eui-64 ! See my message earlier today for the URL for my book that I took this from. :-) This bit of config tells the router to be a stateless autoconfig client on ethernet1 and to ask a DHCPv6 server for a prefix. Note that prefix delegation and address assignment are two completely different features, it's not just a case of setting the prefix length to 128. The resulting prefix is stored in the variable dhcpv6prefix and subsequently used to number interface ethernet2, which will then automatically send out router advertisements using the /64 in question. Note that bits 56 - 63 are set to A0 here which means the prefix that is received must be at least a /56. IIRC, the RAs reuse the DHCP timers so renumbering becomes very easy. > Will assignments only occur if the prefix is /64? > What happens if the PD is something other than /64? E.g. a /80, or > a /120, for examples. In the example above you need a /56. I haven't tested it, but I assume a longer prefix will work if you set the ethernet2 prefix length to something small enough except that if you send out RAs with a prefix other than /64 the hosts won't autoconfigure addresses. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Alain Durand
- Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf briand
- Re: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Brian Dickson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Bob Hinden
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Brian Dickson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Bob Hinden
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Brian Dickson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Bob Hinden
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Brian Dickson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Bob Hinden
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Tim Chown
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf james woodyatt
- RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf DE JUAN HUARTE FEDERICO
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf james woodyatt
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Alain Durand
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf james woodyatt
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Alain Durand
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf James Carlson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Brian Dickson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Ralph Droms
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf James Carlson
- RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Templin, Fred L
- RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf James Carlson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Templin, Fred L
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Ralph Droms
- RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Templin, Fred L
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Brian Dickson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Jim Jackson
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Ralph Droms
- Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf Iljitsch van Beijnum