Fwd: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO value 3

[Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at nokia.com>]

FYI

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Jukka MJ Manner" <jmanner at cs.Helsinki.FI>
> Date: May 14, 2008 3:51:08 PM GMT+02:00
> To: Transport Area WG <tsvwg at ietf.org>, Internet Area <int-area at ietf.org 
> >
> Subject: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO  
> value 3
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We are in the middle of fixing the IP Router Alert Option registry and
> allocations, and one issue affects the current RSVP implementations.
>
> There are two values that indicate end-to-end RSVP:
> "1" Datagram contains RSVP message 	[RFC2711]
> "3" RSVP Aggregation Level 0		[RFC3175]
>
> We are currently proposing that value "3" should be removed from  
> use, and
> reserved (not to be allocated to any protocol). Thus, value "1"  
> should be
> used to indicate end-to-end RSVP.
>
> The question is: who have RSVP implementations for IPv6, and would  
> this
> change break something?
>
> Regards,
> Jukka
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------