Re: [Isms] pre11 comments

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 01:48:30AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
 
> True, unless the user name "randy" is being distributed by two different
> protocols but should have different access rights under one vs the
> other.  The current discussions surround being able to separate
> different users from different protocols so that something configuration
> over some magic distribution protocol can actually work to make the
> problem go "poof".

I assume we more or less agree that we have to be able to
differentiate between names coming from different secure transport
models. Any violent disagreement with this statement?

If the above is correct, then question seems to be whether a) we by
default make all the names different leaving it to explicit
configuration to treat them the same if needed or b) we make them by
default the same leaving it to explicit configuration to make them
different where needed. Is this a fair statement?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms