Re: [Isms] current naming agreement

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:17:16 -0400, "David B. Nelson" <d.b.nelson at comcast.net> said:

DBN> Will there be an IANA registry for this 1 to 4 character code?  Or
DBN> will we allow implementers to each make up their own set of
DBN> abbreviations?  I think an IANA registry is required, for purposes
DBN> of interoperability.

I think that some of the other registrations options could be just fine
too, but I think IANA is probably the best of that set of options.  So
yes, I agree, it'd require IANA text and action.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms