Re: [Isms] current naming agreement

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:39:05 +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de> said:

JS> If the prefix is dropped by TSM, then I think all the "higher" layers
JS> in the SNMP engine should never see/worry about the prefix. So it is
JS> TSM's job to put the prefix back in place again for outgoing
JS> notifications.

Well, except it's not the lower layers that actually care.  Really, the
thing that cares the most is the VACM which is where we need it.  The
"agent" is the one that needs the prefixed name since it can check the
VACM for ssh:juergen vs dtls:juergen when the scalar is set to false
regardless of whether it's checking the authorization of a SET or a INFORM.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms