 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--On Tuesday, August 05, 2008 12:33:48 PM +0300 Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com wrote:
Wes Hardaker wrote:DH> I am of the impression this would require yet another DH> mapping table to support a feature that is not needed by DH> everybody. Actually, I think it drops the need for one.This reply comes a bit late... but I think I agree with Wes here: allowing "user at host" as SSH transport address could drop the need for one mapping table on notification originators (it's not that important for command generators).
+1 _______________________________________________ Isms mailing list Isms at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms