Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-02.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-02.txt



On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:25:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> You are both missing the point.
> Why does the entry need to have a status at all?
> What purpose does it serve?

You're right, it serves little purpose.

Rather, we need to document how the entry came about (from the
publication of an RFC, individual registration).

A way to mark an entry as obsoleted might be nice though.  Someone adds
GSS_Foo(), then later realizes that it should have some extra argument
and they register GSS_Foobar() -- it'd be nice if they could mark
GSS_Foo() as updated/obsoleted bu GSS_Foobar().
_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.