Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-02.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-02.txt
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> --On Tuesday, March 25, 2008 04:32:40 PM +0000 Alexey Melnikov
> <alexey.melnikov at isode.com> wrote:
>
>> Indeed, "obsolete" is very useful. Adding an entry as experimental ("I
>> don't know if this is going to work, I might have to change the API
>> later
>> on") might be useful as well.
>
> Nope; it doesn't matter. The purpose of the registry is to register
> use of the name, not to serve as a development tracking database.
I agree that the primary purpose it to register use of names.
> I suppose one might define a whole taxonomy of interface stability
> designations and what they mean, but really, an IANA registry is not
> the place for that.
Why not? :-)
Ok, I am actually fine with just having the obsolete flag in the registry.
_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.