Eric Burger writes:
Sigh. Part of me says, "Get it done."Another part of me says, "Internet protocol; cannot assume all in same administrative domain."Reality is, "Informational document." Thus, "Get it done" side of my brain wins. Go for stream+. (Just my vote - if anyone feels strongly otherwise, please speak up now!)
I didn't quite understand what the proposal is.If I understand it: The proposal is to add a new knob to IMAP URIs which an entity (which? an IMAP server or client?) can add (where?). Access to the URI is then granted only to entities that are known to be streaming servers.
I don't see how this helps security. If I'm an attacker and have such a URI, then (AFAICT) I can obtain the data by connecting to the streaming
Arnt _______________________________________________ lemonade mailing list lemonade at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade Supplemental Web Site: http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade