[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format
Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Tue, 05 April 2005 20:12 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA09511; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:12:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DIuXN-0003Ju-0H; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:20:39 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DIu8I-0006mj-CM; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:54:42 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DIu8G-0006mV-JN for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:54:40 -0400
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA02393 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:54:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DIu58-0000r3-TL for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:51:27 +0200
Received: from du-001-171.access.de.clara.net ([212.82.227.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:51:26 +0200
Received: from nobody by du-001-171.access.de.clara.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:51:26 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:51:45 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4252EC51.72CD@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <634978A7DF025A40BFEF33EB191E13BC0ADE8084@irvmbxw01.quest.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: du-001-171.access.de.clara.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format
X-BeenThere: ltru@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Addison Phillips wrote: > Whups. <g> Are you sure that you want to mention \n %x10, and if you are sure, how about %x0A or %d10 ? I really thought that it's more or less 2822 compatible, and then you'd have CrLf, not Lf. How about: ...separated by a line "%%" ? Or if you want ABNF: ...seaparated by a line "%%" CRLF. Just copy what you need from RfC 2234bis (LF, CRLF, and LWSP line folding instead of the ugly "\" line continuations). Google says that "record-jar" is based on RfC 822, and then it's CRLF and folding, not LF and "\". Thanks for the sneak preview... ;-) Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Randy Presuhn
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] is there some wiskey in the jar - [was: Re… JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Jon Hanna
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Scott Hollenbeck
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] is there some wiskey in the jar - [was… John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] is there some wiskey in the jar - [was… JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Misha Wolf
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Preparations for smart matching Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Scott Hollenbeck
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Misha Wolf
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Jon Hanna
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] zh-min-nan and en-GB-oed (was: Registry in… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] zh-min-nan and en-GB-oed (was: Registr… John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Debbie Garside
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Debbie Garside
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Misha Wolf
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Debbie Garside
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Debbie Garside
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Matching metrics (was: Registry in record-… Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] LTRU participation and warning Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Matching metrics (was: Registry in rec… John Cowan