Rechartering terminology (was: [Ltru] Charter Discussion)

[co-chair hat on]

At 09:07 06/06/21, Addison Phillips wrote:

Debbie Garside wrote:

>> I'll take that as a vote for re-Charter then!

[aside: in the IETF, we don't count votes]

>That is a vote for doing 3066ter in this group, soon-ish, with quite limited
>scope for change---almost a RFC3066bis "second edition" or errata,
>rechartering if necessary.

Just a small terminology correction:

"Rechartering", in the context of the IETF, and as far as I can
remember, refers to changing a group's charter, usually when
extending a group's duration. Because both of our current deliverables
are (mostly) done, if we want to continue work in this group, we
need to change the charter, which means that we need to recharter.

Closing the group, with the option of later creating a new group
(which would have a new acronym, e.g. ultru (update of language
tag registry update :-)) is different from rechartering.

Regards,   Martin.

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru