Re: [Ltru] Re: Extlang stability

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Thu, 13 September 2007 13:24 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVog5-0002lc-D4; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:24:17 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IVog4-0002lX-5V for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:24:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVog3-0002lP-S5 for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:24:15 -0400
Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVog1-0004fO-Pg for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:24:15 -0400
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1IVog1-0001mk-B1; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:24:13 -0400
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:24:13 -0400
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Extlang stability
Message-ID: <20070913132413.GD16592@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <20070912140051.GA15603@mercury.ccil.org> <fcb6rc$kj3$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fcb6rc$kj3$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: ltru@lists.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Frank Ellermann scripsit:

> Wrt the resources, I've no clue why e.g. (no, nb, nn) or (bs, hr, sr,
> sh) are recognized sets, while (de, gsw, nds) or similar groups aren't
> identified as related.  It appears to be inconsistent.  But as long as
> those sets are only identified in the registry, not in the tags, it's
> no serious problem to split, join, add, or remove sets later.

Which is why I agree that the Macrolanguage: header is a Good Thing.
The argument for extlang subtags (other than sign languages) is as a
shim between 639-2 and 639-3 and nothing else.

-- 
Not to perambulate                 John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
    the corridors                  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
during the hours of repose
    in the boots of ascension.       --Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru