Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards

[Bill Fenner <fenner at research.att.com>]

>I think it would be much more true to the description in RFC 2026,  
>though, if we had an automated process that added a list of PS  
>documents "for review" to the IESG agenda every two weeks, so that  
>these documents actually were reviewed by the IESG 24 months after  
>publication and every 12 months thereafter.

An automated process to get this info has existed forever (*), but may be so
underpublicized that I'm the only person (including the rest of the IESG)
that knows about it: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/1old_standards.txt

There's a bit of a startup problem with the proposal of having them
automatically on the IESG agenda - there are 61 Draft Standards and
696 Proposed Standards on the list.

  Bill

(*) - web.archive.org sees a version from 2001; my recollection is that
it existed before that
.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html