Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards

[Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com>]

On Aug 11, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> > Of course with 750 PS and DS documents in circulation and ~25   
> > telechats per year, we're talking about having the IESG review  
> > the  status of an average of 30 documents per telechat, which  
> > might be  fairly daunting even after we hit steady state.
>
> And pointless. The only ones that should ever get on an agenda are
> ones supported by an implementation report (for DS), a deployment
> report (for STD) or a disuse report (for Historic).

I agree.  Personally, I would favor a short update to RFC 2026 to  
remove this responsibility from the IESG.  In the meantime, I am not  
personally bothered by the fact that the IESG is ignoring this  
responsibility.

Margaret

.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html