Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards

[John Leslie <john at jlc.net>]

Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com> wrote:
> Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>>
>> Of course with 750 PS and DS documents in circulation and ~25  telechats 
>> per year, we're talking about having the IESG review the  status of an 
>> average of 30 documents per telechat, which might be  fairly daunting 
>> even after we hit steady state.
> 
> And pointless. The only ones that should ever get on an agenda are
> ones supported by an implementation report (for DS), a deployment
> report (for STD) or a disuse report (for Historic).

   Might I suggest an ION stating an IESG procedure that in the absence
of an implementation, deployment, or disuse report every PS or DS due
for IESG review shall be placed on a single agenda item to maintain
them at the same maturity level for the following 12 months?

--
John Leslie <john at jlc.net>
.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html