[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards

To: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>
Subject: Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim at cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:30:17 -0400
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-3.cisco.com; header.From=sbrim@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: Spencer Dawkins <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>, newtrk at lists.uoregon.edu
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=309; t=1155436219; x=1156300219; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=sbrim@cisco.com; z=From:Scott=20W=20Brim=20<sbrim@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[newtrk]=20Reviewing=20state=20of=20PS=20and=20DS=20standards; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DOVk7N6rm6wp78DwbyxfvhOsyC64=3D; b=SZhPEzJ/FSAQupZ+QJDj0vl22NsGKtDG6pwARb/uu7yrXY1vDYbVojNkIAjTFDsRUHfE+EiP 7rWvEl9LQcaA3Pf4yZboZCKvWt6VJ65y8584yKVgj0Yo/USBmibTobO7;
In-reply-to: <FA538F7764DB050296A2A8E9@[192.168.1.100]>
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc.
References: <20060810134748.E3B7E8790D8@newdev.harvard.edu> <5EFF4685F90F3D52C42154D8@[192.168.1.100]> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608111307250.4199@netcore.fi> <B10EDDB6ACE5A937F9E9CAF3@[192.168.1.100]> <003501c6be70$00acd860$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com> <FA538F7764DB050296A2A8E9@[192.168.1.100]>
Sender: owner-newtrk at lists.uoregon.edu
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060719 Thunderbird/1.5.0.5 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0

On 08/12/2006 22:16 PM, John C Klensin allegedly wrote:
> This is precisely why I wish that, instead of talking about "gating", we
> were doing a serious critical path analysis of IETF workflow(s).

Isn't "talking about 'gating'" part of that?  What would you do for a
"serious critical path analysis"?
.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
  - From: Scott Bradner
- Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
  - From: Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
  - From: Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
Next by Date: Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
Previous by thread: Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
Next by thread: Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread