RE: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model
"Tolga Asveren" <asveren@ulticom.com> Tue, 06 December 2005 13:17 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjchX-0002zY-41; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:17:47 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjchV-0002yD-4E for sigtran@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:17:45 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA27409 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:16:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bw.ulticom.com ([208.255.120.38]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejd2z-0001Te-8q for sigtran@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:39:58 -0500
Received: from colby.ulticom.com (colby.ulticom.com [192.73.206.10]) by bw.ulticom.com (BorderWare MXtreme Mail Firewall) with ESMTP id FA41D84908 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:17:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pcasveren (pc-asveren.ulticom.com [172.25.33.55]) by colby.ulticom.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with SMTP id jB6DHOIL021409 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:17:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Tolga Asveren <asveren@ulticom.com>
To: sigtran@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:59:05 -0500
Message-ID: <GBEBKGPKHGPAOFCLBNAMMEIMDJAA.asveren@ulticom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <20051206060641.C22063@openss7.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
Importance: Normal
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.40
Received-SPF: pass
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c3a18ef96977fc9bcc21a621cbf1174b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org
I also agree with Brian. Thanks, Tolga > -----Original Message----- > From: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sigtran-bounces@ietf.org]On > Behalf Of Brian F. G. Bidulock > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 8:07 AM > To: Ilie Glib > Cc: sigtran@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model > > > Ilie, > > I disagree. > > Nevertheless, SE is 1 AS with a symmetric RK. > > --brian > > Ilie Glib wrote: > (Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:14:36) > > Brian, > > > > I think SUA relay deserves as much (as little) network management as > > M3UA relay does, because they use the same SCTP service (IP network). > > Redundand relay nodes (IPSP) will provide the same connectivity to > > IPSPs sitting behind them. > > > > In addition, SUA RFC allows DUNA, DAVA, DUPU, to be sent from > IPSP relay nodes. > > > > Ilie > > > > On 12/6/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <bidulock@openss7.org> wrote: > > > Ilie, > > > > > > SCCP relay is a different thing than MTP relay (transfer function). > > > MTP requires network management across the relay, SCCP doesn't. > > > > > > --brian > > > > > > Ilie Glib wrote: (Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:48:59) > > > > Brian, > > > > > > > > according to SUA RFC, IPSPs can also have relay capability. > Is SUA RFC > > > > so outdated, that it does not worth discussing it? > > > > > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > > > > > Ilie > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <bidulock@openss7.org> wrote: > > > > > Ilie, > > > > > > > > > > For SE AS1==AS2 (and RK1==RK2). > > > > > > > > > > For DE AS1!=AS2 (and RK1!=RK2). > > > > > > > > > > You need double the AS, RC and RKs in DE as you do in SE. > > > > > > > > > > Because they can't relay, IPSPs only need 1 AS betwixt them. > > > > > > > > > > --brian > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Brian F. G. Bidulock > > > bidulock@openss7.org > > > http://www.openss7.org/ > > > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > bidulock@openss7.org > http://www.openss7.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
- [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Ilie Glib
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Ilie Glib
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Ilie Glib
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Ilie Glib
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Tolga Asveren
- RE: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Tolga Asveren
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Ilie Glib
- RE: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Tolga Asveren
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Ilie Glib
- Re: [Sigtran] AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model Ilie Glib