RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt

["Samir Srivastava" <samirsr at nortel.com>]

>
>Please also not repeat topics that have been beaten to death already.
>

Though I have not seen any ENGINEERING reason coming so far on this. I
welcome any light coming even with heat too to enable me cross the
HURDLES. IMHO, SIPS has been beaten to death couple of times. 

I have read very closely couple of times the meeting minutes sent by
Dean. It nowhere mentions that it will be adopted as STANDARDS track
document. It might be decision in the Prague, but afterwards on the
list, I have not seen any UNANIMITY on the list to pursue this as
standard track document. 

Dean himself mentioned that SIPS is LARGELY broken, but we owe the
explaination to the community which is using it. So I have still my
objection to proceed it as STANDARDS track, where chairs also seem to be
aligned. Please correct me, if my interpretation is incorrect.

Thx
Samir



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip