Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>]

On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Francois Audet wrote:

>   2.  Do we need the sips option tag? The current document assumes  
> that
>        we do use the option tag, and that is the preference of the
> author.
>        (There is at least one dissenting voice on that one: Hisham).

I'm confused on why we would need it and would want to understand why  
it is needed before commenting on this. I don't buy the needing it to  
enforce deprecate of last hop rule - I see problem in that it leads  
to two bits that mean the same thing and we have to deal with all the  
corner cases of when they conflict. It also makes me wonder if there  
are problems when a URI is copied from one situation to another and  
the REquires: sips header is not.

Cullen <with my individual hat on>



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip