[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Interaction of SIPS with old implementations that weren't really using SIPS (was Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt)
I should have known better not to waste my time answering your
questions when you obviously don't care about the answers.
I won't make that mistake again.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srivastava, Samir (SC100:8826)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:25
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: 'sip at ietf.org'
> Subject: RE: Interaction of SIPS with old implementations
> that weren't really using SIPS (was Re: [Sip]
> draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt)
>
> >
> >On your first question: If I send you a request using a SIPS
> URI, and
> >you accept it even if you don't support SIPS (because you
> are a buggy
> >implemenation), you will nevertheless put SIP in the various URIs in
> >your response, e.g., in the Contact header. You may even muck-up the
> >From or To. If you send me mid-call requests later, you will most
> >probably use SIP URIs in From. If I detect something like
> that, I can
> >probably figure out something is wrong. Some of this is
> already covered
> >in the draft and in RFC 3261.
>
> If it just doesn't support SIPS, It should just return "416
> Unsupported URI scheme".
> Very pointed question, why do we want to develop standards
> for the BUGGY implementation. At the _most_, we can just say
> in BCP/INFORMATIONAL document that if it behaves like this,
> then it is buggy implementation. And we don't attempt to fix
> it in the specification. If we take this route, we might find
> numerous others BUGGY implementations of other parts of SIP
> specifications also. I just call them BUGS. And bugs are
> fixed by their owners during the upgrades/patches etc.
> >
> >On your second question. It's not the protocol that is
> broken but the
> >implementation.
> >
> We should not even attempt to fix the broken implementation
> via another add-on standards. I don't want to say now as Dean
> yesterday said season is over for hunting. Keep trying to fix
> it. Good luck.
>
> Thx
> Samir
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip