Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-sips-03.txt: Closing of Opened issues

[jh at tutpro.com (Juha Heinanen)]

Thomas Froment writes:

 > Yes, actually, on my side, I did not answer your last remark because I 
 > think this is NOT related to "double RR" versus "R-R rewriting" question.
 > You can choose to either double R-R or rewrite, but the question you are 
 > raising is: are you allowed to continue to use "transport=TLS" or not,
 > this more a question related to sip/sips clarification: currently this 
 > is clearly stated in sip/sips that TLS transport parameter should not be 
 > used...

thomas,

yes, i understood that this is not a your problem.  that is why i now
posted the question explicitly to author of sips i-d.  if sips i-d tells
in the case of my example to upgrade sip: to sips: there is a BIG bug in
it.  

for some reason this issue was missing from the issues list that the
author of sips i-d just posted.

-- juha


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip