[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt
I think it would be reasonable to ask Christer for that clarification
to be added.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh at tutpro.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 13:13
> To: Dean Willis
> Cc: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); Hadriel Kaplan;
> sip at ietf.org; Christer Holmberg
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt
>
> Dean Willis writes:
>
> > Outbound already provides a discovery mechanism letting a
> UA find out > whether or not a proxy supports STUN over SIP.
> If I understand it > correctly, this draft is an attempt to
> make such a mechanism available > in the absence of Outbound.
>
> dean,
>
> that is fine and i hope that the draft is rewritten to
> clearly limit its
> scope to "letting a UA find out whether or not a proxy supports STUN
> over SIP".
>
> then existing UA/proxy implementations would not get broken and we
> can completely ignore this draft in openser proxy.
>
> -- juha
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip