Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-outbound

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juha
> Heinanen
>
> Francois Audet writes:
>
>  > 4.2.1 says "However, a UA MUST support sets with at least two
>  > outbound proxy URIs and SHOULD support sets with up to four
>  > URIs.". This section makes it very clear that you are supposed to
>  > support multiple proxies. There is some wording about limiting
>  > it for battery life, etc., but it is pretty clear to me that's it is
>  > not optional.
>
> where does it say that the UA MUST register with all proxies in the set?
> i fought a long battle on that one and lost.  may be a miracle has
> happened and the issue has been revisited?
>
> if there is any text left in the draft that you don't need to register
> with all proxies in the set, for example, if you want to save battery
> life, then the draft is useless, because proxies in the set cannot trust
> that each outbound UA really registers with every proxy.

Now I'm getting even more confused. :)
First you argue to let the UA's decide what's best for them, and now you're saying the proxy needs to trust/know that each UA registers with every proxy.  Why is that?  How does it change the behavior of the proxy?

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip