Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt

["Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg at ericsson.com>]

Hi Juha,
 
Since there seems to be different opinions on whether CRLF has already been implemented by everyone, whether an indication is needed etc, what is wrong with what you proposed earlier, that the draft would not explicitly forbid sending CRLF even if keep=yes is not returned? That would work both for those who think an indication is needed and those (including yourself) who don't think it's not needed.
 
Regards,
 
Christer

________________________________

From: sip-bounces at ietf.org on behalf of Juha Heinanen
Sent: Fri 09/05/2008 07:48
To: Dean Willis
Cc: sip at ietf.org; Francois Audet; Christer Holmberg
Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt



Dean Willis writes:

 > It's about keeping your NAT binding alive and KNOWING that it is 
 > alive, rather than just hoping. That requires bidirectional traffic.

yes and as i have said many times, CRLF has already been implemented in
ser and openser proxies.

-- juha
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip